I really think Netfugl should consider a policy regarding watermarks on photos uploaded to the site. It completely ruins the aesthetic experience of viewing a photo, and it makes absolutely no sence.
Best regards, Søren
Ps. except from that, a nice shot..
In my opinion the photographer should have the right to decide whether there should be a watermark or not on the photo.
Certainly they should, but Netfugl has the right to decide if a photo is accepted or rejected. Despite this being an excellent photo of an interesting species I agree with Søren.
Tak - og undskyld for den overdrevne "beskyttelse".
You don’t need to apologize. My comment was meant as a general attitude toward watermarks on photos at Netfugl.dk
I’ve posted photos at this site for some years, and I've only seen a few violations of copyright, which is why I find such a massive watermark unnecessary. But that's just my personal opinion.
Most of all I think it’s a pity that such a beautiful picture of White-backed Woodpecker, as this one, does not appear without any distracting elements!
|Nye kommentarer til dette billede er ikke muligt.|
|Bemærk: at alle billeder har copyright og må ikke anvendes uden accept fra den respektive fotograf.|